This work is based on tutorial by conbagui-very great tutorial indeed, i have learned something new

I think this is little "warmer", funnier scene, instead of cold blue space

Have fun..again

And now i have make some testing with brushes,colors etc Any suggestions?

Dude, that purple planet looks fantastic! did you make that yourself or is it a stock?

Yes it is free stock, and i have also some brushes from www.deviantart.com. But i really enjoy make 2d/3d stuff from scratch
And this image was really "fast" project: good tutorial gives you more than good ideas

Beautiful results, and yes, I love his tutorials. Which one did you use?

Even forgetting the extreme unlikeliness of getting 4 planets this close my eyes have a lot of trouble guessing where the sun(s) is/are since no planet/moon has the same shadow as another...

The 5 minutes gaseous giant:

- take any picture with the tone you need
- select a 1pixel strip in it, copy to clipboard
- create a new square picture, the size of the strip
- bucket fill with "clipboard" pattern
- apply some light distortion (ripple filter or else)
- Filters/Map/Map object and map to sphere (directional light, remove specular)
- Put on black background

A Breton fishing boat that now looks like Uranus:

Well this is sci-fi art anything is possible

In art and sci-fi everything is possible, even travel faster than light

Conbagui have that Saturn Space tutorial(and other tutorials)-really great and i also search tutorial videos from youtube

Well, looking through NASA/Caltech/JPL's ''Travel Poster'' of the recently discovered TRAPPIST-1 system, it's probably more likely than you realise to have such a close alignment of planets, and no doubt other star systems could have multiple light sources (nearby stars, nebulae etc) to make the light cast on them appear to be from differing angles. Anyway, I found this at https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/trappist1/
Planetary scene.

Read the description. This is an "artist's fantasy"... plus it doesn't try to be a space scene, but a spoof of some poster for a travel agency. Planets this close(*) would crash into each other within minutes.


(*) because on Trappist-1, all the planets are rocky planets with about the same size. So the two planets at the center are at best a planet diameter apart. Interesting video (and read the comments):

Yeah see what you mean, maybe that's how the asteroid belt came about (planets being too close together).

The current theory is the opposite: the asteroid belt would be the result of Jupiter's gravitational pull preventing planetesimals from accreting in a full-size planet.

On the other hand, the existence of the moon is best explained by a Mars-sized celestial body hitting the Earth, the moon being a good part of the debris that coalesced (the rest eventually coming down to Earth or escaping in the Solar System).

That theory has been proved wrong. The moon's composition is very different to the earth's
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-diffe ... chemically

Yes you're correct there ofnuts, silly me, of course that's the reason
Sallyanne, The Moon's composition IS different but that's to be expected given the Earth and the Moon's separate formations, the Moon would have cooled a lot quicker than the Earth did which would drastically alter the composition. However I don't think that disproves the current thinking about the Moons formation, most scientist go with the giant impact theory.. hypothesis whatever )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis