I like this one!
Quote:
How I judge the amount of available documentation
Quote:
Too dense. It's not easy to find specific informations
Perhaps that's how poor, beleaguered dinasset felt when he kicked off
that
documentation deluge from me last October.
But he did get a nice script out of it at the end of the week.
Do keep that one in though. That one is for me. It is a good one.
Just a small language technicality: it is said and written as 'information'
it is never written in a plural form. Two or more items of knowledge, news,
intelligence remains just one aggregation: a (singular) body of 'information',
even though that aggregate may consist of many individual pieces of intelligence.
Now if you have some information on a particular matter, and I follow along
with additional facts, figures, pictures, videos, and what have you on that
matter, 'information' does not have the opportunity to go plural: for our two
aggregates at once and the same time may be regarded as one larger aggregate
so 'information' remains stuck in the singular form. It never gets to be in
a plural form with an 's' on the end.
Now is that too dense or what?
Another line of inquiry could be where they first heard of, or got G'MIC.
It first came to me in a Fedora distribution; they were installing into Gimp
for awhile. Someone else here noted just today that they learned of it
from Pat David's blog. Interesting to know from where people first learn
of G'MIC.
Garry