It is currently Thu Jul 25, 2024 7:22 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:57 pm  (#41) 
Offline
GimpChat Founder
User avatar

Joined: May 22, 2008
Posts: 5242
Location: Gimpville
Give these a try. :bigthup

Updated Font Here

_________________
“If you reach for the stars, you just might land on a decently sized hill.” - Stuart Hill


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:06 pm  (#42) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Jun 02, 2013
Posts: 2075
Yep, that works:

Image

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:10 pm  (#43) 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Posts: 13080
Location: Native to NYC living in Arizona, Gimp 2.8 & 2.10, Win 11 PC.
GnuTux wrote:
Give these a try. :bigthup

What did you do!? :hoh

_________________
Image
"A wise man learns more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer"
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:54 pm  (#44) 
Offline
GimpChat Founder
User avatar

Joined: May 22, 2008
Posts: 5242
Location: Gimpville
I converted from one font type to another, then back to .ttf. Another problem was that both fonts had the same internal font family name, so when you placed them both in the GIMP folder, they became two of the same font.

_________________
“If you reach for the stars, you just might land on a decently sized hill.” - Stuart Hill


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:07 am  (#45) 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Posts: 13080
Location: Native to NYC living in Arizona, Gimp 2.8 & 2.10, Win 11 PC.
GnuTux wrote:
I converted from one font type to another, then back to .ttf. Another problem was that both fonts had the same internal font family name, so when you placed them both in the GIMP folder, they became two of the same font.

You tricky devil you... I'll try it and see. :roll:

_________________
Image
"A wise man learns more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer"
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:37 am  (#46) 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 14182
Did you use Fontforge to do this Tux? Did you change the name in one of them? Anyway, nice job, I still want to try this converting stuff too.
Image

I did two, one with the Butterscotch and this metal one and why is that number in the center, It happened on both of them.
Image


This is from same settings but different font. BTW, font name is Viks Dear Love
Image


Could someone try this with the Viking font to see if the numbers appear? Thanks Dear love font attached Dear Love Font

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:11 am  (#47) 
Offline
Script Coder
User avatar

Joined: Jun 22, 2010
Posts: 1171
Location: Here and there
molly wrote:
Could someone try this with the Viking font to see if the numbers appear? Thanks.


I get the same unsupported character glyph if I use either font in GIMP 2.8.2 on Windows 7, BUT they work properly on GIMP 2.6.7

Kevin


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:14 am  (#48) 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 14182
Getting stranger all the time, Did you use the fonts Tux posted Kevin?

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:17 am  (#49) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Jun 02, 2013
Posts: 2075
GnuTux wrote:
I converted from one font type to another, then back to .ttf. Another problem was that both fonts had the same internal font family name, so when you placed them both in the GIMP folder, they became two of the same font.

I tried converting it to otf, but it didn't work. Never thought to convert it back to ttf.

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:18 am  (#50) 
Offline
Script Coder
User avatar

Joined: Jun 22, 2010
Posts: 1171
Location: Here and there
molly wrote:
Getting stranger all the time, Did you use the fonts Tux posted Kevin?


Yes


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:44 am  (#51) 
Offline
Script Coder
User avatar

Joined: Oct 25, 2010
Posts: 4758
'0020' is the hexadecimal representation of 32, which is the ASCII and Unicode code of the space character. But I don't get this in my own "fixed" font.

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:14 am  (#52) 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 14182
O, I don't understand that stuff, so I guess this font is just plain Cranky. Grr

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:44 pm  (#53) 
Offline
GimpChat Founder
User avatar

Joined: May 22, 2008
Posts: 5242
Location: Gimpville
I just tested it and space is an invalid char on my system too. Must have happened in the conversion.

_________________
“If you reach for the stars, you just might land on a decently sized hill.” - Stuart Hill


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:04 pm  (#54) 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Posts: 13080
Location: Native to NYC living in Arizona, Gimp 2.8 & 2.10, Win 11 PC.
GnuTux wrote:
I just tested it and space is an invalid char on my system too. Must have happened in the conversion.

You managed to get it to work though.

_________________
Image
"A wise man learns more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer"
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:49 pm  (#55) 
Offline
GimpChat Founder
User avatar

Joined: May 22, 2008
Posts: 5242
Location: Gimpville
I used FontForge to copy in another character and cleared it to make a space.

The fonts have been renamed so remove the old ones before using these.

Image


Attachments:
File comment: Viking Font Fixed Space
Viking-Font-Fixed-Space.zip [9.57 KiB]
Downloaded 89 times

_________________
“If you reach for the stars, you just might land on a decently sized hill.” - Stuart Hill
Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:15 am  (#56) 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 14182
Image

I don't know how you did it but I am not surprised. :teeth

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:32 am  (#57) 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Nov 16, 2011
Posts: 5128
Location: Metro Vancouver, BC
Wallace wrote:
This seems more trouble then it's worth. Nonetheless, this is the first and only font I've ever encountered that gave me this sort of issue.
I wash my hands of this font. :(
Have you seen, Celtic Garamond the 2nd?

_________________
Image
Gimp 2.8.18, Linux, median user
Gimp Chat Tutorials Index
Spirit Bear (Kermode)


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:33 am  (#58) 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Posts: 13080
Location: Native to NYC living in Arizona, Gimp 2.8 & 2.10, Win 11 PC.
Odinbc wrote:
Have you seen, Celtic Garamond the 2nd?

No I haven't, thanks Odin. :bigthup

_________________
Image
"A wise man learns more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer"
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:40 am  (#59) 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 14182
Thanks Odin, I like that one.

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:14 pm  (#60) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Feb 12, 2014
Posts: 27
Location: Brazil
Maybe it's a little late, but I will just add some extra info.

I have my own font engine and I tested this font "Viking Younger Runes".

This font has some bad points. This kind of problem is very common in non-professional fonts, since it's easy to forget some garbage when creating glyphs in font editors.

Most bad fonts I have dealt with work on Windows font rasterizer, and some of them have much worse errors than this one. This kind of problem is so usual than some years ago I also needed to code, in my font rasterizer, some algorithms to remove bad data. All times I have debugged a particular problematic font, the bad data were not visible when drawing.

If a program you are using requests a missing font (because it's not there or it couldn't be loaded), most font engines use a default one. In Windows XP, the default font is Arial or MS Sans Serif, depending on some extra factors.

_________________
Image


Top
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


   Similar Topics   Replies 
No new posts Attachment(s) Font In Status Bar Not Loading Correctly (on top of other font issues)

4

No new posts Attachment(s) custom font

8

No new posts Font Authors

5

No new posts Attachment(s) Font Changing

12

No new posts Attachment(s) GEGL font name?

7



* Login  



Powered by phpBB3 © phpBB Group