K1TesseraEna wrote:
Don't see why it should be a request for gmic filter.
It's a question of technique. In theory, versatile programs like PS or GIMP
should be able to reproduce the effect pixel-to-pixel, don't they?
But they can't. At least, I've seen none so far.
Motion/directional blur simply doesn't cut, I've tried.
because for some effects you just need the right tools
Quote:
Oh, I like the effect, it's looks dramatic, novel and off the beaten path.
Personally, not impressed with shiny or textured stuff anymore,
to my taste, they all look like yesterday. But it's just me
i know what you mean
Gimp is somewhat stuck in a past decade but i still feel all the "old" texteffects that you can find on the internet need to be explored and re-engineered because, well nobody did it, or at least i have never seen anything like it anywhere and i think thats a pity
we have new aesthetics now - i see it in fashion (Rick Owens, Julius, Lost & Found, Boris Bidjan Saberi, etc.) and its great
everything seems to go more into the minimalistic direction
tbh, the texteffects i do, are really just bad taste, they always were
just imagine a CD cover with a gold texteffect - horrible, lol
its gimmick crap
but at the same time they are a lot of fun to do