Switch to full style
Post all Gimp scripts and script writing questions here
Post a reply

Has anyone compiled Resynthesizer 2.03 for Windows?

Mon Nov 23, 2020 3:59 am

Someone posted a thread at DPR's retouch forum for resynthesizer which got me into a quest which led to this discovery. I'm still using Resynthesizer 1.0 by the way. lololol

Below's the link to the latest; any help would be appreciated. :)

https://github.com/bootchk/resynthesize ... tag/v2.0.3

Below is a history release of the versions for the curious:

https://github.com/bootchk/resynthesizer/releases

Re: Has anyone compiled Resynthesizer 2.03 for Windows?

Mon Nov 23, 2020 5:16 am

It would certainly help if there was a definitive 2.03 version for Windows users. Even the code for that is 3 years old. https://github.com/bootchk/resynthesizer

At the moment the best bet is the resynthesizer / resynthesizer-gui from the Partha Gimp 2.10.x although comparing the files from Gimp 2.10.22 to an ealier release there is no obvious change and might be 2.02 or 2.03

Still using resynthesizer v1 ?
Most Windows user problems on g-f.net are because of that old version or downloading the code and expecting it to work :) I do wish they would change the information on the webpage. In the meantime the working samj resynth files are here: https://www.gimp-forum.net/Thread-Resyn ... 7#pid12687 Did you have a problem with those one time ? Memory fails

I will attach the Partha version for anyone interested.
Edit: There is a branch of the code as well, only two years old. Uses a python gui https://i.imgur.com/mso0GbL.jpg

Hopefully you get those updated 2.03 files.

Re: Has anyone compiled Resynthesizer 2.03 for Windows?

Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:21 am

Thanks for that, Rich. Look forward to trying 2.02 since supposedly from 2.x, he supported multipthreading (which hopefully means faster results). As for the 1.0 version, he does link to the wayback machine version at the Registry and you still can download the plugin from that (I did a check already). :)

edit:

It is noticeably faster, Rich (not much but still faster). Again, thanks a heap. :)
Post a reply