ktw wrote:
I absolutely agree on the usability part - I'm thinking of doing something like coffeescripter com/code/ad-gallery.
As for the tutorials - I hope I'm not asking too much here - but do you think it'd be possible to be a bit more specific? Which versions were you referring to? Or if you had to choose just one version of each type - one for kids, one for a cartoon animal and one for a more realistic representation - which versions would they be (there is a # above each tutorial that shows which version it is - eg. "Alternative Tutorial #3 - For Kids" - means version #3).
Thanks again!
What I'm going to say I don't mean to sound mean!!! I Promise!!!
I'm also quite picky so...yeah.
Also I think making steps you did a very good job, they look easy to follow, it's no the steps that's the "problem" (it's not a problem I just don't know what other word to use. :S) it's the images themselves.
These are a few of them, imo either don't look like the subject matter at all or just are a bit sketchy.
Doesn't look much like a monkey imo:
http://www.wedrawanimals.com/images/tut ... a03t01.pngThis seems a bit sketchy and sloppy:
http://www.wedrawanimals.com/images/tut ... a01t01.pngAlthough it's meant to be simplified is doesn't look much like a deer at all. :S
The first of the 2:
http://www.wedrawanimals.com/images/tut ... a02t01.pngFor VERY young kids I suppose all this doesn't really count but in general it's just how I see it.
P.S: I could put a link to your website on my blog, I don't have many viewers overall but I do have some and maybe it'll give you more "clientele". :>