molly wrote:
:bump
Thanks Tux,
ok, I downloaded the scm and deleted the .py, I opened an image, I selected her right eye... I went to edit/copy, then ran the script at 275 blur. with the pasted copy selected, (not the mask). I ended up with the original layer
but no blur. The blur did show up in the preview. my xcf is below in attachments and my selection here.
If I had the blur set at 275, wouldn't that eye be almost fully blurred?
I watched Rich's video 4 times and I did the same as he did.
Rod, how did you end up with a blank transparent layer?
Molly, I guess you can't see the blur if you try to paste the blurred selection on exactly the same image.
It's just my guess, but I can tell you that I downloaded your image, duplicated it, SCALED it, then feathered-pasted into the SCALED one and it worked, while trying to feather-paste on the duplicated image without scaling it didn't work.
Don't know why, I'm not a technician
edit: made some other test
it works also on a duplicated not rescaled image, BUT NOT WITH THE SO HUGE VALUE you entered;
your value practically CLEARS (FADE OUT) THE WHOLE SELECTION, try with 150 for instance...