It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 3:28 am


Latest GIMP Scripts & Plug-ins

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Some Interesting Results Using GNU XaoS
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 9:36 am  (#11) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Mar 23, 2012
Posts: 3258
Location: UK
AFAIK it's Windows only.

_________________
Image




Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject: Re: Some Interesting Results Using GNU XaoS
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 10:13 pm  (#12) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Mar 23, 2012
Posts: 3258
Location: UK
Hey Gnu Tux. Try this in Xaos!

1. Fractal/untick Mandelbrot mode
2. Type in the following seeds: -0.804 and -0.172
3. Calculation/iterations change to 300
4. Filters/palette emulator
5. Fractal/palette/colour cycling
6. UI/Autopilot
7. Sit back and enjoy the ride! :pengy

_________________
Image




Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Some Interesting Results Using GNU XaoS
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:36 am  (#13) 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 16, 2010
Posts: 9354
Location: "Looking for my eraser" =P
Nice! :)
That looks pretty cool.
You may have to right click and click play/pause to see the video. :)
(wmv|mpg) Video format : (wmv|mpg)

_________________
Image
Gimp Rocks Blog
Simply Gimp Tutorials
"Once your in the cloud, you're in the net"
____________
OK, . . . . so what's the speed of dark?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Some Interesting Results Using GNU XaoS
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:21 am  (#14) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Mar 23, 2012
Posts: 3258
Location: UK
Nice stuff! I don't know how much you know about fractals, but that is a Julia set. I believe it was named after Mandelbrot's teacher. If you zoom in on a Mandelbrot, in the deep V between the two large circles, you can see the spiralling shapes whose co-ordinates make good Julia seeds. Actually, if you've got a fast computer, you could increase the iterations to say 600. Mine didn't run smoothly when I tried it, that's why I suggested 300. 600 would help fill in the holes when zoomed in.

_________________
Image




Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

* Login  

* Subscribe to Gimp Chat's RSS Feed    * Subscribe to Gimp Chat's Tutorial RSS Feed


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group