It is currently Thu Nov 12, 2026 12:06 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Does 72 DPI vs. 300 DPI make a big difference for ebook covers?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:20 pm  (#1) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 21, 2015
Posts: 220
Location: Itasca, Illinois
GIMP Version: 2.8.14
Operating System: Linux
OS Version: Xubuntu 15.04 Vivid
GIMP Experience: Intermediate Level



When buying digital photos for the ebook covers I make, I see 72 DPI (usually for the smaller sizes) and 300 DPI photos. I know DPI means Dots Per Inch, but really what does it signify? Are the same size photos bigger files depending if they're 72 or 300 DPI? For instance a photo of 1800X2700, would the 300 DPI file be much bigger than the 72 DPI file? Are there any limitations in using GIMP's features using one or the other? Thanks.

_________________
"When people agree with me I always feel that I must be wrong." --Oscar Wilde


Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Orkut Share on Digg Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Technorati
Top
 Post subject: Re: Does 72 DPI vs. 300 DPI make a big difference for ebook covers?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:42 pm  (#2) 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Posts: 14268
Location: Native to NYC living in Arizona, Gimp 2.8 - 3.0, Win 11 PC.
In some cases yes.
I read that 900 DPI and no larger than 1 MB for large display images. I would use minimum 300 Dots per inch (DPI, or dpi).

I found this...
Attachment:
screencapture-ebookindiecovers-com-ebook-cover-size-requirementsspecifications-ebook-cover-sizes-different-sites-1443548387645.png
screencapture-ebookindiecovers-com-ebook-cover-size-requirementsspecifications-ebook-cover-sizes-different-sites-1443548387645.png [ 1.87 MiB | Viewed 3375 times ]

http://ebookindiecovers.com/ebook-cover ... ent-sites/

_________________
Image
"A wise man learns more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer"
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Does 72 DPI vs. 300 DPI make a big difference for ebook covers?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 1:03 pm  (#3) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 16, 2011
Posts: 5127
Location: Metro Vancouver, BC
For the average digital screen 72 DPI is fine, for print & retina display go with 300 DPI.
BTW, a 72 DPI screen is arbitrary, Why 72 dpi?

_________________
Image
Gimp 2.8.18, Linux, median user
Gimp Chat Tutorials Index
Spirit Bear (Kermode)


Top
 Post subject: Re: Does 72 DPI vs. 300 DPI make a big difference for ebook covers?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:08 pm  (#4) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 21, 2015
Posts: 220
Location: Itasca, Illinois
Wallace wrote:
In some cases yes.
I read that 900 DPI and no larger than 1 MB for large display images. I would use minimum 300 Dots per inch (DPI, or dpi).

I found this...
Attachment:
screencapture-ebookindiecovers-com-ebook-cover-size-requirementsspecifications-ebook-cover-sizes-different-sites-1443548387645.png

http://ebookindiecovers.com/ebook-cover ... ent-sites/


Thanks Wallace. And that's a great link. Especially since it's so current.

_________________
"When people agree with me I always feel that I must be wrong." --Oscar Wilde


Top
 Post subject: Re: Does 72 DPI vs. 300 DPI make a big difference for ebook covers?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:12 pm  (#5) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 21, 2015
Posts: 220
Location: Itasca, Illinois
Odinbc wrote:
For the average digital screen 72 DPI is fine for print & retina display go with 300 DPI.
BTW, a 72 DPI screen is arbitrary, Why 72 dpi?


Thanks Odinbc. And I've heard the 300 DPI is necessary for actual book covers. In a way it's a moot point because almost all the images I see big enough for ebook covers are 300 DPI.

_________________
"When people agree with me I always feel that I must be wrong." --Oscar Wilde


Top
 Post subject: Re: Does 72 DPI vs. 300 DPI make a big difference for ebook covers?
PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 4:07 am  (#6) 
Offline
GimpChat Member

Joined: Mar 04, 2011
Posts: 2629
iggy wrote:
Odinbc wrote:
.. I've heard the 300 DPI is necessary for actual book covers. In a way it's a moot point because almost all the images I see big enough for ebook covers are 300 DPI.


Consider the purpose of the image.

You want to physically print it, on paper, as a book cover
Then a typical paper back, 4" x 7 " @ 300 ppi = an image size 1200 x 2100 pixels.

Otherwise, the print resolution 300 (or anything else) is irrelevant.

But this is an ebook, going to be read on a reader/tablet/computer.

What display sizes are current, the occasional/older 7" tablet 600 x 1024 pixels.
Then a bunch of tablets 7"/8"/10.something" all 800 x 1280 px. The formfactor for these is called candybar with a ratio 1: 1.5 (The 80 px at the bottom is for controls)
As mentioned earlier some retinex displays about 1500 x 2000 and some really for video 1920x1080 HD.

This is a screenshot of a 7" tablet. 8" / 10" all going to be the same 800 x 1200 screen pixels. A laptop even worse, most have a screen depth of 768 px.

Attachment:
cover.jpg
cover.jpg [ 116.7 KiB | Viewed 3237 times ]


Looks to me that at the moment an image size is 800 x 1200 is good. Perhaps future proof by upping the image size to 1600 x 2400 pixels. The reader application, epub/mobi/pdf will scale to suit anyway.

Want to use 900 dpi as a setting (one of the contradictory offerings in the above reference) go ahead. Makes no difference.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Does 72 DPI vs. 300 DPI make a big difference for ebook covers?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:54 am  (#7) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 21, 2015
Posts: 220
Location: Itasca, Illinois
rich2005 wrote:
iggy wrote:
Odinbc wrote:
.. I've heard the 300 DPI is necessary for actual book covers. In a way it's a moot point because almost all the images I see big enough for ebook covers are 300 DPI.


Consider the purpose of the image.

You want to physically print it, on paper, as a book cover
Then a typical paper back, 4" x 7 " @ 300 ppi = an image size 1200 x 2100 pixels.

Otherwise, the print resolution 300 (or anything else) is irrelevant.

But this is an ebook, going to be read on a reader/tablet/computer.

What display sizes are current, the occasional/older 7" tablet 600 x 1024 pixels.
Then a bunch of tablets 7"/8"/10.something" all 800 x 1280 px. The formfactor for these is called candybar with a ratio 1: 1.5 (The 80 px at the bottom is for controls)
As mentioned earlier some retinex displays about 1500 x 2000 and some really for video 1920x1080 HD.

This is a screenshot of a 7" tablet. 8" / 10" all going to be the same 800 x 1200 screen pixels. A laptop even worse, most have a screen depth of 768 px.

Attachment:
cover.jpg


Looks to me that at the moment an image size is 800 x 1200 is good. Perhaps future proof by upping the image size to 1600 x 2400 pixels. The reader application, epub/mobi/pdf will scale to suit anyway.

Want to use 900 dpi as a setting (one of the contradictory offerings in the above reference) go ahead. Makes no difference.



Thanks Rich. Interesting. From my experience the ebook distributors (esp. Apple) keep wanting bigger and bigger covers. It used to be they wanted 400X600. Then they wanted 800X1200. Some places now want 1600X2400. The safe bet (for now) is to give them 1800X2700. Everybody can reduce them to whatever size they want.

_________________
"When people agree with me I always feel that I must be wrong." --Oscar Wilde


Top
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



* Login  



Powered by phpBB3 © phpBB Group