Average image, well kind'a

trandoductin · **Posted:** Sat Oct 10, 2015 12:46 am **(#81)**

2-ton wrote:

It is beautiful

Thanks 2-ton

AnMal · **Posted:** Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:38 am **(#82)**

trandoductin: that one is lovely! i see you've posted a script too, looks very useful!

Wallace · **Posted:** Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:31 am **(#83)**

trandoductin wrote:

average of 115 images of Buddha.
used eyes to align (I used the above script) but it still involved a lot of tedious repetitive work.
[ Image ]

Nice Buddha image.
:bigthup

trandoductin · **Posted:** Sat Oct 10, 2015 10:15 am **(#84)**

Wallace wrote:

trandoductin wrote:

average of 115 images of Buddha.
used eyes to align (I used the above script) but it still involved a lot of tedious repetitive work.
[ Image ]

Nice Buddha image.
:bigthup

Thanks Wallace

trandoductin · **Posted:** Sat Oct 10, 2015 11:15 am **(#85)**

AnMal wrote:

trandoductin: that one is lovely! i see you've posted a script too, looks very useful!

yeah i wrote the script so that i don't have to switch program to spread sheet and manually enter percentage to scale...trying to be as lazy as i can

trandoductin · **Posted:** Sun Oct 11, 2015 2:37 pm **(#86)**

273 images of Eiffel tower (not aligned at all).

2-ton · **Posted:** Sun Oct 11, 2015 6:29 pm **(#87)**

I like the aligned average images, not so much the non-aligned ones.

trandoductin · **Posted:** Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:08 pm **(#88)**

2-ton wrote:

I like the aligned average images, not so much the non-aligned ones.

me too..
but non aligned images sometimes surprise me more, with aligned images i can sort of imagine what it's going to look like since features that are aligned with emerge much more than non aligned features.
here's another non aligned one (257 images) of "Brown hair".

RobA · **Joined:** Jul 14, 2010 **Posts:** 697

trandoductin wrote:

here's another non aligned one (257 images) of "Brown hair".

Are you resizing these all the same before averaging them?

I was wondering if this could make a poster. Doing at this size then scaling the result would be faster but would have enlargement artefacts. Would scaling them all up first then running the average eliminate such artefacts?

-Rob A>

trandoductin · **Posted:** Mon Oct 12, 2015 2:43 pm **(#90)**

RobA wrote:

trandoductin wrote:

here's another non aligned one (257 images) of "Brown hair".

Are you resizing these all the same before averaging them?

I was wondering if this could make a poster. Doing at this size then scaling the result would be faster but would have enlargement artefacts. Would scaling them all up first then running the average eliminate such artefacts?

-Rob A>

I resize them all to 1000x1618 or 1618x1000 then average them.

trandoductin · **Posted:** Tue Oct 13, 2015 10:16 am **(#91)**

I thought this one was kind'a cool
80 images of sunflowers (not aligned).

Odinbc · **Posted:** Tue Oct 13, 2015 10:39 am **(#92)**

Looks good trandoductin.

trandoductin · **Posted:** Tue Oct 13, 2015 2:12 pm **(#93)**

Odinbc wrote:

Looks good trandoductin.

Thanks Odin!

Wallace · **Posted:** Tue Oct 13, 2015 3:43 pm **(#94)**

trandoductin wrote:

I thought this one was kind'a cool
80 images of sunflowers (not aligned).

trandoductin · **Posted:** Sun Nov 04, 2018 1:18 pm **(#95)**

I forgot how to use these astronomy .c plugins.
How do i get it to work for GIMP 2.10 on Linux? like what do I do with the .c files to get the plug in to run? anyone?

trandoductin · **Posted:** Sun Nov 04, 2018 1:30 pm **(#96)**

never mind i think i found it:
gimptool-2.0 --install plugin.c

gimper66 · **Posted:** Sun Nov 04, 2018 3:03 pm **(#97)**