It is currently Thu Jul 25, 2024 9:26 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:18 pm  (#61) 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Posts: 13080
Location: Native to NYC living in Arizona, Gimp 2.8 & 2.10, Win 11 PC.
leocda wrote:
Maybe it's a little late, but I will just add some extra info.

I have my own font engine and I tested this font "Viking Younger Runes".

This font has some bad points. This kind of problem is very common in non-professional fonts, since it's easy to forget some garbage when creating glyphs in font editors.

Most bad fonts I have dealt with work on Windows font rasterizer, and some of them have much worse errors than this one. This kind of problem is so usual than some years ago I also needed to code, in my font rasterizer, some algorithms to remove bad data. All times I have debugged a particular problematic font, the bad data were not visible when drawing.

If a program you are using requests a missing font (because it's not there or it couldn't be loaded), most font engines use a default one. In Windows XP, the default font is Arial or MS Sans Serif, depending on some extra factors.

What do you mean by, "bad points"?

_________________
Image
"A wise man learns more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer"
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:33 pm  (#62) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Feb 12, 2014
Posts: 27
Location: Brazil
Good question. :geek

I didn't debug the font to have a detailed log (it usually takes a long time). I just passed the font through my test programs (as I said, I'm already used to this kind of thing). The program that tests the geometric data (lines and splines) integrity failed.

From my previous debugging sections, the most common errors I already got are:
- shapes with just one point;
- shapes with several points, but all are the same;
- shapes with zero area (just 2 points, or many collinear points);
- splines with unexpected end (missing points);
- glyphs with positive polygons that are inside negative polygons (holes).

If it doesn't make sense for you, never mind. I was just trying to say that the font is guilty, not gimp. :bigthup

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Font Looks Much Different?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 5:42 pm  (#63) 
Offline
GimpChat Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Posts: 143
I've run into a lot of fonts like that. They work in native Microsoft programs like Word, but in Linux or in software ported to Windows -- PHOOEY. Something wrong with the file structure that Windowsy things don't care about -- or like.

_________________
Image


Top
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


   Similar Topics   Replies 
No new posts Attachment(s) Font In Status Bar Not Loading Correctly (on top of other font issues)

4

No new posts Attachment(s) custom font

8

No new posts Font Authors

5

No new posts Attachment(s) Font Changing

12

No new posts Attachment(s) GEGL font name?

7



* Login  



Powered by phpBB3 © phpBB Group