Esper wrote:
may i suggest a couple of things ?
Please !
Esper wrote:
1. to me G'MIC is not about cute fluffy tiger puppies, its a collection of filters coders put in there with mostly no explanation
I don't totally agree with that assertion. I agree that the G'MIC plug-in comes with a lot of apparently not documented filters. But on the contrary, there is a (huge) reference page with all available commands, with examples and small explanation for each command :
http://gmic.sourceforge.net/reference.shtmlYes, this is a quite "technical" documentation, but considering the project is not so old (mi-2008), and that writing documentation is a pain, it's not so surprising that the G'MIC plug-in for GIMP (which is only one specific interface of the G'MIC framework) doesn't have his own documentation page.
Esper wrote:
2. G'MIC has a lot of useful stuff to offer, but its way too esoteric
3. cute tigerpuppies are for kids, G'MIC is not
Right ! And that's because initially, this project was not intended for a large audience as it has now (digital artists). It was aiming to help researchers in the Image Processing field. Thanks to the different interfaces we developed, it has reached a more wide audience. But still, a lot of documentation is missing. Any help would be of course appreciated to fill this hole.
Esper wrote:
4. a lot of people have no idea how to pronounce G'MIC
Me neither !
The project is free, so I guess the pronunciation should be free too
Esper wrote:
5. G'MIC is not about magic, its about code = math - so how about "Greyc Mathematical Image Converter" ?
Maybe 'Mathematical Image' could be misunderstood, as specific images found in mathematics. I like the 'Magic' part of the name, as I like it in 'ImageMagick' or 'GraphicsMagick'.
Esper wrote:
6. it really doesnt matter what G'MIC means, but its a good sounding name
Really, you're the first to say that. Most of people find it sounds awful.
Esper wrote:
require every coder to write a manual for his filter (short or long) or at least a description that everybody can understand
In a small project like G'MIC, I cannot *force* the contributors to respect such guidelines. There are not enough contributors that would like to do such a thing. I definitely prefer to have contributors providing new but undocumented filters, that no filters at all.
You have to convince yourself that G'MIC is really a *small* project, and we don't have many people 'technically' involved in the project. Maybe it has a lot of potentials (that's what I think personally), but it must attract more people to be able to exploit this potential.
Esper wrote:
come up with a logo for G'MIC that looks good and somehow explains how its pronounced, so people can speak about it, without breaking their tongues
maybe like this (just a rough sketch of an idea) ?
Attachment:
Logo Sketch.png
Why not. I'm open to any new ideas for a nice looking logo. I like the current one, but I have it only in a small resolution, and a new logo could be a great idea.