path-inbetweener

Rod · **Joined:** May 16, 2010 **Posts:** 16252

molly wrote:

Thanks ofnuts. As I said to Wallace, why does his points show when he is in the path mode? I never see the points. I know I used to see them all the time doing other projects and I could get rid of them by just choosing another tool.

Molly you need to select the path tool first then click on the path.

molly · **Joined:** Apr 07, 2010 **Posts:** 14182

I do that Rod, My path called back is a red outline and the one called front is a blue outline, but I never get the points, with or without the eyes on or off.

Rod · **Joined:** May 16, 2010 **Posts:** 16252

Molly if you select the path tool in the tool box and click the path line itself you can switch between each path (by selecting the path layer), and the nodes will show

Rod · **Joined:** May 16, 2010 **Posts:** 16252

molly · **Joined:** Apr 07, 2010 **Posts:** 14182

Thanks Rod, I was clicking the path itself instead of the actual image.

oldmangrumpy · **Posted:** Tue Nov 11, 2014 2:03 pm **(#186)**

I have been having a lot of fun with both 'path-inbetweener' and 'path ladder' over the last few days but wonder is it possible to generate too many paths for 'stroke or fill path' script to handle? I have created a large number of paths from separate path pairs but when, with all visible, I go to stroke them from a gradient I receive an error message ..

I can though reduce the number visible at any one time and selectively stroke/fill them with that gradient until all are all completed.

Or maybe I am doing something 'senile' and do not realise it.

ofnuts · **Joined:** Oct 25, 2010 **Posts:** 4812

oldmangrumpy wrote:

I have been having a lot of fun with both 'path-inbetweener' and 'path ladder' over the last few days but wonder is it possible to generate too many paths for 'stroke or fill path' script to handle? I have created a large number of paths from separate path pairs but when, with all visible, I go to stroke them from a gradient I receive an error message ..

[ Image ]

I can though reduce the number visible at any one time and selectively stroke/fill them with that gradient until all are all completed.

Or maybe I am doing something 'senile' and do not realise it.

Could be a bug, but I don't really see what would cause that "9" to appear. Can you attach the XCF with all the paths (you can drop the layers, I just need the paths), and tell me the exact options you used?

oldmangrumpy · **Posted:** Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:32 am **(#188)**

Ofnuts - I have attached 2 XCF files with paths on which I received the error code when attempting to stroke with gradient.

The options for the stroking were -

If you require any further info please let me know.

ofnuts · **Joined:** Oct 25, 2010 **Posts:** 4812

oldmangrumpy wrote:

The options for the stroking were -
[ Image ]

Your monitor is so bad that even screenshots are blurry

ofnuts · **Joined:** Oct 25, 2010 **Posts:** 4812

Download version 0.6 from the usual place. That should fix it.

oldmangrumpy · **Posted:** Sun Feb 15, 2015 2:50 pm **(#191)**

Learning more about use of multi component paths and Ofnuts path generation tools now ...

Pat625 · **Joined:** May 12, 2015 **Posts:** 4693

Where can I download the latest release of path inbetweener?

oldmangrumpy · **Posted:** Sat Aug 01, 2015 9:31 pm **(#193)**

Pat625 - I just checked ofnuts pages - try this http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimp-pa ... s/scripts/

Pat625 · **Joined:** May 12, 2015 **Posts:** 4693

OMG: Thank you but I've tried several times to download the file from there. I might be doing something wrong. If I click the file, what I get is all the script coding, lines and lines of it. I don't know what to do with that. If I right click and use "save target as" with the .py, it does not work.

oldmangrumpy · **Posted:** Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:26 pm **(#195)**

Pat625 - I have just tried the link and it works OK; click the 'path inbetweener' name on the left of ofnuts script list and it should take you to a new page which should auto download the file to your PC.

I understand that there were some problems with 'sourceforge' recently but it looks OK now.

ofnuts · **Joined:** Oct 25, 2010 **Posts:** 4812

Pat625 wrote:

OMG: Thank you but I've tried several times to download the file from there. I might be doing something wrong. If I click the file, what I get is all the script coding, lines and lines of it. I don't know what to do with that. If I right click and use "save target as" with the .py, it does not work.

A common pitfall is that your browser adds a .txt extension after the .py, and the Pythin registration looks for .py files not .py.txt ones. If you file explorer is still using the default of not showing extensions, this can go unnoticed for a while.

Pat625 · **Joined:** May 12, 2015 **Posts:** 4693

Ofnuts: I don't see .txt after anything. How do I stop this from happening? I tried to download a file about a week ago and had the same problem. Since then no problem until now. I have Windows explorer, Windows 7.
I just tried to download from SourceForge on my husband's computer. I got the same problem. If I left click, takes me to another page which is all code. If I right click as use save target as and use .py it will not work.

ofnuts · **Joined:** Oct 25, 2010 **Posts:** 4812

Pat625 wrote:

If I right click as use save target as and use .py it will not work.

That's how it should be done though. What do you mean exactly by "it will nor work"? Do you see it in the menus (right click in the Path lists, then a "Tools" submenu? Did you save it in the "plug-ins" directory of your profile? If you are on OSX did you mark it as executable?

Pat625 · **Joined:** May 12, 2015 **Posts:** 4693

It does not show up in the paths list. I'm using Windows 7. When I had originally downloaded the first version, it showed up in the paths list as it was supposed to. I deleted it when I tried to get version 0.2. It does not show in the paths lists. I did save it in the plug-ins directory.

AnMal · **Posted:** Sun Aug 02, 2015 11:23 pm **(#200)**

oldmangrumpy: that image is simply amazing! it's impressive how far you've come in your relatively short time with gimp. you know exactly how to make use of those scripts and plug-ins.