ofnuts wrote:
Ask the developers. IMHO, this will happen when there will be a libbpg library for Linux.
One may also wonder if there are any patents involved. JPEG was supposed to be superseded by JPEG2000 (wavelet encoding) but since it was patent-protected it didn't happen.
Similar link was posted on the PCLOS forum on Saturday.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/12 ... eg_killer/Got the code and compiled it for 32 bit.
It is 2 command line applications, and
encode is very-very slow and limited to jpeg and png.
5 minutes here to re-encode a 2.77 MB jpeg straight from camera to a 0.86 MB .bpg file. So there is a big file size saving.
Decoding limited to ppm or png but is much quicker, 7 seconds for that image to png
Attachment:
bpg.jpg [ 64.42 KiB | Viewed 5975 times ]
Comparing the original jpg and decoded png and diff-ing layers, I could not see any difference, so maybe no additional artifacts.
Will it ever be adopted, probably not. AFAIK the default
jvctv decoder is opensource but the better HEVC encoder is patented by the evil MPEGLA.
edit: there is possibility to include a x265 encoder which might be patent-free?
Maybe reach a situation same as mp3 audio, where LAME is perfectly acceptable in Europe but prone to litigation in the US.