Dinasset, your experimentation is very interesting and many of your results are really very good.
I love those sets the most:
Sixth set (3 sizes)
Tenth set (3 sizes)
Eleventh set (3 sizes)
Twelfth set (3 sizes)
The bigger the size, even the better result.

Thanks Isabella for your evaluation.
I like to get "viewers" opinion, otherwise I have just only mine.

Just in case some "viewer" likes to compare the effect of the sets shown sofar one close to the other, same source image, medium size (3000).
1,2,3

4,5,6

7,8,9

10,11,12

Sorry Diego, these outcomes are less my taste. That's why I didn't comment earlier.

Still I selected a few.

#5 - the first one
#18 - set 2000
#19 - set 2000
#20 - set 2000
#23 - 1

Thanks Ella.
But I do not post them to get only "like", I'm interested in knowing a simple evaluation such as:
- I don't like
- I dont' care (neutral, insignificant for me)
- I like
I had a dear friend in the first time of GC who said once (not to me, to another GC-er): "I do not write a comment, if I can't say something good about", I assume you are of the same idea. But that is not helpful for the author, because there is a difference between "I don't like" (=you better drop this effect) and "I don't care (=as such, but maybe you may improve it).

Dinasset, I have downloaded your last images so that I could to choose better and compare better the effects.
My best ones are;
1, 2, 3, 6, 11
I suppose that each image demands an effect better than others.
El effect applied on 6, looks like a painting and I like that.
Thanks for sharing your experiments.

Thanks Isabella.
True the relation image<->effect, for the comparison I chose an image with part of landscape (BG) and part of figure (not human, but animal) to better identify critical aspects.
In my mind (alas, MY mind...) any of those outcomes SHOULD look as a painting...6 is likely more evident for you, I see.

Diego, I see what you mean. And it's partly true.
But it remains difficult for me to say what you have to do to make your work more attractive "to me personally" when the work is less of my taste.
I then just indicated which outcomes I liked the most.

Isssabella can evaluate better than I can, as it appears

I know it's difficult, but who better than a person with an artistic soul like you can try...

Dinasset, if you still need, or want another opinion:

Sets 10 and 12 I liked best equally, all 3 sizes but greater size better.
Sets 4 and 5 were nice especially at the larger sizes.

Sorry I didn't respond earlier. I still have the old funky computer with an attitude.

Thanks, Pat.
Yes, I still and always need to get an opinion from those who see my experiments, particularly from my friends.
It's the only way to assess their "value" (if they have a value...).

Experimenting a new processing flow.
Used only the two styles approved by all my 3 GC-Friend-Queens: FPS10 and FPS12.



(small output size)

I love both. A very nice look on them.

Thanks Isabella.
This third outcome obtained using the style voted by two of the three "Queens": FPS11.
Same source image.

About the remaining styles summary:
- 4 have been voted by one "Queen": 1,4,5,6.

Their "quarter-of-an-hour" glory:
(using a different source image, not to be monotonous)
FPS01, voted by Ella:

FPS04, voted by Pat:

...

...
FPS05, voted by Pat:

FPS06, voted by Isabella:


(The remaining 5 styles remain "frozen" in my pocket, not having received any vote)